| |
Case Studies: An example
Case Studies: An example
101LV: Virologic failure in an antiretroviral
naïve patient following suboptimal exposure to
indinavir
This case presentation discusses a patient who
virologically failed his current antiretroviral regimen
secondary to sub-optimal indinavir exposure. The case goes
into further detail about therapeutic drug monitoring of
indinavir, and drug-food and drug-drug interactions
involving indinavir.
|
Indinavir pharmacokinetics, Therapeutic drug
monitoring, Drug-food interactions, Peripheral
neuropathies, and Virologic failure.
|
|
LV is a 49 year old black male with unknown
risk factors for HIV.
He has no known drug allergies or
intolerances to date.
|
|
LV has a history of the following opportunistic
infections:
-
PCP and Oropharyngeal candidiasis.
His chronic conditions include:
-
HIV+ since April 13,1999 and AIDS since April
23,1999.
-
Depression. Anemia. History of seizures
He has a recent onset of seizures with unknown
orgin.
|
|
LV was referred for multi-disciplinary
discussion because he had been exposed to
suboptimal indinavir doses, possibly leading to
an increase in his viral load. The patient also
complains of tingling and numbness in his feet.
LV began antiretroviral treatment (ARVT) in
April of 1999, after being diagnosed with HIV
and AIDS following hospitalization for PCP.
During the hospitalization, LV was started on
his first ARV regimen by a physician unfamiliar
with HIV therapies. The regimen consisted of
indinavir 200 mg po tid and
zidovudine/lamivudine one tablet po bid. LV
also experienced seizures while in the hospital
and was started on phenytoin.
LV was first seen at the immunodeficiency
clinic on 06/04/99. Prior to the visit, his
indinavir dose had been increased to 400 mg po
tid, and he was taking indinavir with meals. A
blood sample was drawn to determine indinavir
concentrations. The resulting concentration was
lower than expected. Indinavir was subsequently
increased to 800 mg po tid and
zidovudine/lamivudine was changed to didanosine
and stavudine. LV was counseled by the clinical
pharmacist on how to appropriately take his
ARVT.
LV’s viral load result from 06/04/99
showed a one-log decrease following
initiation of ARVT in April of 1999. The
follow-up viral load in July of 1999 revealed a
one-log increase despite having
increased indinavir to the recommended dose of
800 mg po tid and counseling LV on medication
adherence and appropriate medication
administration. The provider requested an
assessment of this case and recommendations for
new ARVT.
|
|
Current ARVT:
-
Indinavir - 800 mg po tid - started 6/4/99
-
Stavudine - 30 mg po bid - started 4/27/99
-
Didanosine - 300 mg po qd - started 4/27/99
Previous ARVT Exposures:
-
Indinavir (suboptimal doses)
-
Lamivudine
-
Zidovudine
Other Medications:
-
Clarithromycin - 500 mg po qd
-
Miconazole - 2% crm top bid
-
Paroxetine - 20 mg po qhs
-
Sucralfate - 1 gm po qid
-
Erythropoeitin - 10,000 u sc tiw
-
TMP/SMX - 1 tab po M/W/F
-
Phenytoin - 400 mg po qhs
-
Multi-vitamin - 1 tab po qd
-
Metoclopramide - 10 mg po bid
|
|
Date
|
HIV RNA (Copies/ml)
|
CD4 (Cells/mm3)
|
Other
|
|
July 1st, 1999
|
1670
|
|
Hg = 10 g/dL
Hb = 31%
RBC = 3.02 x million
|
|
June 4th, 1999
|
158
|
162
|
Indinavir = 952 uM 3 hr post dose
Hg = 8.1
Hb = 23.2%
RBC = 2.6 x million
Erythropoetin = 209 cu/mm
Phenytoin = 3.5 ug/ml (10-20)
|
|
April 29th, 1999
|
2663
|
|
|
|
-
LV has very good self-reported adherence with
ARVT
-
No recent drug or alcohol use.
-
Lives at home with parents.
-
Works as a grocery store manager.
-
His depression is currently being treated
with an SSRI
-
No children at home.
|
Medical:
|
|
HIV+, AIDS, anemia, depression, seizure
history.
|
Pharmacologic:
|
Indinavir Pharmacokinetics
Although there is no clear therapeutic range
for indinavir, and pharmacokinetic parameters
are highly variable among individuals,
LV’s indinavir concentration from
06/04/99 (0.952 uM) was suboptimal when
compared to published, full pharmacokinetic
profiles of indinavir1. This
suboptimal concentration can be explained by
three factors: suboptimal indinavir dosing,
taking indinavir with food, and administering
indinavir with phenytoin. Initially indinavir
was prescribed at a dose of 200 mg po bid for
unknown reasons and then increased to 400 mg po
bid. The recommended dose is 800 mg po tid. In
addition, LV was taking his indinavir with
food. Since the drug requires a normal acidic
gastric pH (< 3) for optimal absorption, it
should be taken on an empty stomach or with a
light meal2 (toast, black coffee,
etc.). Finally, LV was taking phenytoin along
with his indinavir. Phenytoin is a potent
inducer of the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme
through which indinavir is metabolized. Each of
these factors likely contributed to LV’s
suboptimal indinavir concentration.
Peripheral Neuropathies
LV also complains of peripheral neuropathies,
which are a common side effect of nucleoside
therapy such as zidovudine/lamivudine,
stavudine and didanosine. Stavudine and
didanosine may worsen these neuropathies,
therefore the patient should be monitored
closely for increased severity. If neuropathies
worsen consider discontinuing stavudine and
didanosine. It is also reasonable to consider
treatment of the neuropathies at this time with
amitriptyline or gabapentin3,4.
Virologic Failure
LV’s one-log increase in viral load is
likely secondary to exposure of the virus to
suboptimal indinavir concentrations prior to
increasing the indinavir dose to 800 mg po tid.
This dose may still be suboptimal however,
because of the presence of phenytoin. It is
possible that virologic resistance developed.
At this time, a repeat viral load may be
beneficial to confirm the one-log increase.
Suboptimal concentrations occurred relatively
recently and over a short period of time,
therefore consider continuing this ARV regimen
and adding ritonavir to improve pharmacokinetic
variable s5. A second option is
changing ARVT in LV. In concordance with recent
literature, changing ARVT before the viral load
increases to > 50,000 copies/mL, coincides
with greater antiviral efficacy6.
LV’s most recent viral load was 1670
copies/ml.
|
Nursing/Home Care:
|
|
Patient is feeling better following his recent
hospitalization. He reports being very adherent
with ARVT and reports no significant barriers
to adherence in his life. LV complains of
tingling and numbness in his feet although
these do not interfere with activities of daily
living. He is still able to work without any
difficulty.
|
Psychosocial:
|
|
LV is interested in attending support group
sessions. Arrangements are being made at this
time. His depression is much improved since
starting treatment with paroxetine.
|
-
Repeat viral load to confirm recent increase
-
Consider adding ritonavir 400 mg po bid to
the current ARVT regimen and decreasing
indinavir to 800mg bid.
-
Add amitriptyline 25 mg po qhs for peripheral
neuropathy and titrate as tolerated
|
-
Schedule patient for appointment with
clinical pharmacist to discuss regimen change
and reinforce medication adherence
-
Nurse to call in prescriptions for ritonavir
400 mg bid and indinavir 800 mg po bid.
-
Continue stavudine 30 mg po bid and
didanosine 300 mg po qd.
-
Schedule patient for appointment with
clinical pharmacist to discuss regimen change
and reinforce medication adherences.
-
Draw blood samples at next clinic appointment
to measure indinavir and phenytoin
concentrations.
|
-
Acosta EP, Henry K, Baken L, Page LM,
Fletcher CV. Indinavir concentrations and
antiviral effect.
Pharmacotherapy1999;19:708-12.
[PubMed]
-
Indinavir package insert. Merck and Co.,
Inc., 1996, 1997.
-
Dalakas MC, Cupler EJ. Neuropathies in HIV
infection. Baillieres Clinical
Neurology 1996;5:199-218.
[PubMed]
-
Backonja M, Beydoun A, Edwards KR, Schwartz
SL, Fonseca V, et.al. Gabapentin for the
symptomatic treatment of painful peripheral
neuropathy in patients with diabetes
mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
JAMA 1998;280:1831-6.
[PubMed]
-
Saah A, Winchell G, Seniuk M, Mehrotra D,
Deutsch P. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics
(PK) and tolerability of indinavir (IDV) and
ritonavir (RTV) combinations in healthy
volunteers. 6th Conference on
Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
1999 (abstract no. 362).
-
Carpenter CC, Fischl MA, Hammer SM, Hirsch
MS, Jacobson DM, et.al. Antiretroviral
therapy for HIV infection in 1998: Updated
recommendations of the International AIDS
Society-USA panal. JAMA
1998;280:78-86.
[PubMed]
|
|
|
 |